Open round | 15 points | 40.74% | Problem statement | Official solution | Tags: Phrase translationSemantics
Note how the same English translation can correspond to different Tariana sentences, because of the different evidentiality markers. Obviously Diha/Mayẽ are "He" and "Ismael", while Juse/Naha are "José" and "They", so we just focus on the third words.
| Word | Evidentiality |
|---|---|
| diiɾaka, dimanikaka, namanikaka | see directly |
| diiɾanihka, dimanikanihka, namanikanihka | see clues |
| diiɾamahka | hear/smell clues |
| diiɾasika, dimanikasika | reasoning |
| diiɾapidaka, namanikapidaka | be told |
The suffixes are very apparent: -ka, -nihka, -mahka, -sika, and -pidaka. Therefore, for H1:
a. If "Duha duayhamahka" is "She was swimming (hear clues)", then the equivalent with "see clues" would be "Duha duayhanihka".
b. If "Óli kawhi-nuku dunimahka" is "Olívia was making manioc-flour (smell clues)", and we need to replace "Olívia" with "She" and "smell clues" with "be told", then the result is "Duha kawhi-nuku dunipidaka".
In H2, we need a pronoun that means "you". We already know that "He" = "Diha", "She" = "Duha", "They" = "Naha". Furthermore, note how the verb is "diiɾa" when the subject is Mayẽ/José/Diha, "namanika" when the subject is Naha, and "dukwa/duayha/duni/dumeyuta" when the subject is Óli/Duha. All this suggests that the verb prefix agrees with the subject, so if the verb used in H2 is "piinunihka", then "You" would be "Piha".
Now in H3:
Before doing H4, summarize the grammar so far:
[Subject] [object] [subject agreement][verb][evidentiality]
Now we can translate H4:
d. You were swimming (be told) = Piha piayhapidaka
e. He was raking the garden (see clues) = Diha hinipuku dimeyutanihka
f. Leonardo was sleeping in the hammock (reasoning) = Leó dikwasika
g. You drank manioc-flour (see clues) = Piha kawhi-nuku piiɾanihka
h. They were playing soccer (hear clues) = Naha iɾida namanikamahka